iowa charter agencies
|
|
|
Frequently-Asked Questions
about the Charter Agency Initiative
- What is the charter agency initiative? The charter agency
initiative is a specific,
measurable way to “reinvent” the operation of Iowa
state government. A charter agency is a state department or
division that has been given greater administrative flexibility so
that it can work to accomplish its public purpose in a more
innovative, results-oriented way.
- Why are we talking about “reinventing government?” Many
government regulations, policies and procedures have been enacted
during the almost 160 years since Iowa became a state. Some of
these have become “red tape” over time, requiring citizens and/or
state government employees to take extra steps to get things done.
Now is an excellent time to encourage the people running state
government programs to find and remove red tape requirements
within their agencies, improving services to the citizens, and
saving tax dollars.
- How will charter agencies fit into this plan? Charter agency
directors have accepted the charge to find more efficient and
effective ways to meet their agencies’ public purposes and
financial goals. To encourage innovation, they have been relieved
of some traditional administrative requirements—without compromise
to Iowans’ health and safety or violation of law. These directors
are responsible for achieving more measurable results than ever
before, and for reducing agency operating costs and/or increasing
entrepreneurial revenue collection.
- What is the legal authority for creating charter agencies?
Iowa Code Section 7J.1 allows the Governor to name charter
agencies. Chapter 7KJ defines the flexibilities available to a charter
agency, describes the process for setting aside administrative
rules, and sets up a charter agency grant fund. Governor Vilsack’s
Executive Order No. 28 designated six departments or divisions as
charter agencies.
- What preferential budget treatment is given to charter
agencies, and what limits on their flexibility have been set?
Charter agencies may keep money raised from the sale or lease of
their agency assets. They may keep half of any appropriation
dollars unspent at fiscal year-end as well as an agreed-upon
percentage of any new money their agencies generate. They are
exempted from across-the-board budget cuts in fiscal years 2004,
2005, and 2006.
Charter agencies must submit each of their administrative rule
waiver requests to the director of the Department of Management.
The director of DOM may disapprove a waiver that has an “adverse
financial impact on the state,” violates state or federal laws, or
conflicts with collective bargaining agreements.
- What do we expect them to accomplish? Charter agencies are
expected to find new ways to deliver better value to taxpayers
through greater convenience and efficiency. They are also being asked to
generate more revenue and reduce costs.
- What is the timetable? The six agencies that volunteered for
this initiative signed one-year agreements, to then be
renegotiated annually. Their progress will be evaluated annually.
The flexibilities they use and outcomes they are expected to
achieve will be developed during the project. Charter agencies
will submit regular reports of results to the Iowa General
Assembly.
- Who is involved? Participating charter agencies are:
- The Alcoholic Beverages Division, Iowa Department of
Commerce
- The Iowa Department of Corrections
- The Iowa Department of Human Services
- The Iowa Department of Natural Resources
- The Iowa Department of Revenue
- The Iowa Veterans Home
- What is the Charter Agency Grant Fund? The Charter Grant Fund
is a $3 million fund set up by the Iowa General Assembly to
support innovation projects like training, improvement projects, development of outcomes
measurement systems, or management system modifications. Dollars
will be allocated to charter agencies by the Iowa Department of
Management following an application process.
- What impact will charter agencies have on Iowa’s collective
bargaining agreements? The Charter agency initiative was developed
with a clear understanding that terms of the state’s collective
bargaining agreements would not be compromised. Good cooperation
between the state and its labor unions will provide an opportunity
for a productive collaboration.
- How much will charter agencies save/generate over the
five-year life of the charter agreements? The charter agency
project is intended to benefit the state’s General Fund in the
amount of at least $15 million per year for each year of the
five-year project.
- What impact will charter agencies have on Department of
Administrative Services (DAS) operations? Both the charter agency
initiative and the Department of Administrative Services’
“entrepreneurial management” business approach demonstrate Iowa’s
strong interest in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of
state government. Good cooperation and communication between the
Departments of Management and Administrative Services will assure
that each effort benefits from the experience of the other.
Executive branch agencies, including charter agencies, are
required to purchase services classified as “utilities” by DAS.
Questions asked by Charter Agencies after July 1, 2003:
- How can Charter Agencies waive rules when the
Supreme Court has said that rules have the force of law? Can we
waive rules outside the waiver process in current law? We can
waive rules because the Legislature said we can. That has the
force of law. The Charter Agency provisions make it clear that
Charter Agencies are intended to have special authority to waive
rules, authority beyond the current waiver process.
- Are the unions on board with the contract “side agreement”
provisions? How do we square this provision with DAS’s status as
the sole bargaining agent for the State? Please work with DAS as
you approach any “side agreement” discussions and negotiations.
- Can agencies renegotiate their Charter Agency financial
commitments after the first year? And in subsequent years? Yes and
yes.
- What happens if a Charter Agency falls short of its annual
financial commitment? On the spending side: As with any budget,
the department bears primary responsibility for keeping spending
within the budget. When a department has a budget problem, say
overspending its budget, DOM works with that department to find a
solution. On the revenue side: If revenues do not meet
expectations, DOM will work with agencies to find a way to make up
the difference. The possibility of falling short is one strong
reason for having more than $15 million in commitments. A cushion
will help us avoid problems. As it has turned out, at least $20
million has been achieved in each of the first two years.
- There is an overall concern that when a Charter Agency saves
or brings in revenue, the legislature will “take it out somewhere
else.” How do we keep the legislature from in essence scooping the
fiscal accomplishments of Charter Agencies? While there are no
absolute guarantees, we expect legislative leaders will act in
good faith.
- Is there a need to communicate up-front with legislative
leaders on where agencies are headed, e.g. using increased fees to
hire new staff to provide better service? Yes. Communication with
legislative leaders about plans (and results) is clearly the right
approach. We intend to share agencies’ plans with the legislature
and to keep them updated. We will do our best to avoid surprises.
We will also try to be careful about expectations: positions
funded by increased fee revenue will be dependent on the continued
presence of the increased revenue.
- Can agencies negotiate how much of fees go where? It depends.
If statute currently directs the fees, then “no,” at least not
until the statute is changed. If the fee is currently directed by
rule or other mechanism, then the agency can negotiate changes.
- What happens if the charter agency initiative falls apart in a
year or two? Do they get the money restored? On a more positive
note, we fully expect the initiative to succeed! If there are
unforeseen problems, we will deal with them then.
- If agencies exceed their revenue goals, can they keep the
excess? Similar to the “fees” answer above, it depends. If current
law allows an agency to keep or direct revenue, then “yes.”
Otherwise, probably “no.” Agencies can retain the proceeds from
the sale or lease of assets.
- If an agency sells an asset and keeps the proceeds, do they
lose half the proceeds that are unspent at the end of the fiscal
year? No. The authority to keep proceeds from sale or lease of
assets is independent. The authority to keep half of unspent funds
refers to the amounts appropriated for the year.
|
|
|
|
|